Sunday, December 31, 2006

All About My Ass

Not really -- like I'd write about my ass on my blog?

I did want to give all my interested readers the results of my GI evaluation from last month, which consisted of an upper endoscopy and a sigmoidoscopy (aka: cameras in both ends).

"The upper endoscopy showed normal esophageal mucosa. There was a hiatus hernia with a hyperplastic-appearing polypoid tissue on the gastric side of the GE junction. This was biopsied and showed intestinal metaplasia. There was marked gastritis in the body of the stomach. This was also biopsied. The duodenum was normal. The colonic mucosa was normal, except for one area in the rectum {sorry that's graphic!}, which was biopsied to rule out proctitis and only showed non-specific changes."

He doesn't say what all this means, except that I'm basically fine. Actually something which I perceive to be kind of cool is happening, which is that some of the cells in my stomach have changed to intestinal cells (I'm a mutant!). You can read more about it, here. It supposedly puts me at a higher risk for cancer, according to that link, which is I think why the doctor recommends that I have another endocsopy (the down the throat one) in a year.

I feel like his comments aren't that clear, though, because there were actually three biopsies, and the one of the GE junction (the part he wants looked at in another year) says that I have chronic carditis with focal intestinal metaplasia, and also notes the presence of attached esophageal squamous epithelium.

Now, I'm no doctor, but I'm guessing from this article that he was able to eliminate Barrett's (basically a messing-up of the lower lining of the esophagus, thanks to too much acid, where stomach cells begin to grow in the lower part of the esophagus, and that correlates with cancer -- see here for more info) by the fact that the metaplasia that was observed did not correlate with the area of carditis. I believe, and I could be totally wrong here, that basically the area that is so irritated by acid (which is the area of concern) and the area that is showing the wrong cells in the wrong place are not correlated to a degree that they think I have Barrett's (I should write a new blog where people without any medical training speculate about what pathologists are thinking when they analyze things!). If you look at those articles and then look back at the quote from the doctor's letter, it looks like the metaplasia I have is intestinal cells growing on the stomach-side of my GE junction, which doesn't worry them, because Barrett's related metaplasia would be stomach cells growing on the esophageal-side of my GE junction (aka: you have inflammation related to acid, but the wrong cells growing in the wrong place that can result from that and be bad you DON'T have -- you have the wrong wrong cells growing in the wrong wrong place).

My concern, then, is that he doesn't say anything about H-pylori infection, which can be another reason for the carditis and metaplasia. From what I understand from this article, H-pylori infection is super common, though, and the treatment the doctor recommended for my overly-acidic stomach would basically be what would be used to treat H-pylori infection anyway...I just wish it would have been looked at to see if I have it!

Basically the doctor is keeping an eye on the GE junction (which I'm guessing stands for gastro-esophageal?) to make sure I don't develop Barretts or esophageal cancer, but isn't too worried.

In lower GI news :), I'm also not crazy about thinking there is an abnormal amount of mucous, since the biopsy from down there says that I have "colorectal mucosa with non-specific inflammation, congestion and reactive-type changes" (which basically means: "we're not sure what is going on, but we think it's within the range of normal and just eat more fiber). The good news is that he's confident that I don't have colitis. YAY!

I haven't been taking the Prilosec that he recommended, because I haven't been that symptomatic, acid-wise (except the past two days, when I did take it), but in this letter that he supposedly wrote a month ago but I just got he says to take it every other day even when I don't need it every day to treat symptoms. I guess this is because we're really serious about not damaging the lower part of the esophagus (interestingly, if you read all the links, you'd see that people with Barretts often experience decreased symptoms related to the dysplasia at the GE junction, in part because the stomach cells growing up in the lower part of the esophagus are, like all stomach cells, acid resistant, so a person with stomach cells in their esophagus can't feel the acid reflux as acutely).

Medicine is awesome, and I'm awesome that I can sift through this stuff at nearly 4AM.

VC

Friday, December 29, 2006

Law, Culture, and Notions of Justice

Here is the intro for my awesome elective with Patricia Williams:

This seminar will look at the challenges that rapidly changing cultural norms present with regard to classical notions of jurisprudence. We will consider the problem in three contexts: crime, religion and science.

1. Crime: We will look at the tension between liberty and security fears; the role of tabloid journalism; and profiling (for both courtroom and medical ends). Topics will include the Central Park Jogger case, the Innocence Project, and the abrogation of habeas corpus.

2. Religion: Here we will examine the legal status of faith-based initiatives; fundamentalism as a linguistic construct and mode of textual analysis; and the interplay between iconography, propaganda and freedom of expression. Topics will include a comparison of Bob Jones University's fight for federal funds case and the Solomon Amendment; cases of "reverse religious discrimination" (e.g., assertions that forbidding prayer in schools interferes with religious expression); comparison of controversies regarding religiously inspired adornment (whether veils, turbans, yarmulkes or tee-shirts) in the US, Britain, and France; and public calls for limitations of expression—from the Danish cartoons to the Westboro Baptist Church's protests at funerals.

3. Science: We will consider how the constructs of personhood, autonomy and community might be informed or altered by cyberspace; how assumptions of political equality may be affected by DNA's growing ability to pinpoint and label every last biological propensity, "defect" and inequality; and last but not least, how the popular discussions of the Human Genome Project's work intersects, for better and worse, with the social discourse of eugenics, race and gender.

Materials will consist of handouts ranging from case law and trial transcripts to newspaper articles, model legislation, and snippets from the disciplines of sociology, linguistics and genetics. The class will be conducted seminar-style, with more discussion than lecture. We will also have a number of guest speakers, still being scheduled. In past incarnations of this class, guests have included essayist Calvin Trillin; former Mayor David Dinkins; Randy Cohen (The New York Times' Ethicist); Nicholas Lehmann, dean of the journalism school; Robert Pollack from the department of neurobiology; and a pair of cartoonists from Marvel Comics discussing the history of the Comic Book Codes.

The class will be graded upon class participation and the submission of three journal-style thought pieces reflecting upon each of the above topics.

Thursday, December 28, 2006

Bottom-Line Polling

I just saw this poll on the UNAMA (United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan) website, pretty hilarious in its skeleton approach:

UNAMA Poll
December - Who is most to blame for slow development in Afghanistan?

The UN

The Government

The Taliban


View Results

Previous Poll

In my opinion, I'd answer something like: "Fear of the Taliban and other misunderstandings of the country have prevented the UN from engaging in the capacity-building that would give the government the tools it needs to create an environment conducive to development," so I guess my ranking would be: 1. UN, 2. Government, 3. Taliban (with emphasis on the Taliban as the least important obstacle to growth, even though the other sorts of obstacles it presents, particularly strongly in some parts of the country, have spillover effects that limit the growth potential of the environment).

VC

Wednesday, December 20, 2006

Update To New Schedule

I've just read the course reviews of my professors for next semester, and it turns out that Liebman got fantastic reviews, and Hamburger got really awful reviews (although I suspect that I might see through what students complained about to find a really impressive and engaging scholar).

We'll see!

Of to CA for 9 days.

VC

Spring Schedule

Now you all have it...so don't expect me to repeat it lol

I'm excited by Patricia Williams, who Desi says is an amazing scholar and who really impressed me in person when she shopped her electives to the 1Ls, and I'm also excited by Hamburger, who Desi knew from Chicago and who seems like a pretty nice guy. I'm a little skeptical of Liebman, only because I've interacted with him in person a bit this semester, and while he was really nice to me, I'm not sure how much discipline or commitment he'd have as a professor...it's hard to describe my impression of him, except to say that I think he did fundraising for too long, and so, kind of like a guidance counselor or someone who has to schmooze all the time, his substance has been kind of crowded-out by surface chatter, but at the same time he's smart enough to be disgruntled by all the mandatory BS...it's a tough mix.

Anyway I know it would be really stupid for me to talk about all these things on a blog, except for the fact that my readership of 5, which includes no one connected to the law school in any way, is a pretty trustworthy bunch.

Ok here's the schedule:

CRIMINAL LAW (Edgar)
L6108, Section 2
TBA MTW 9:45am-10:35am
3.0
PROPERTY (Liebman)
L6116, Section 4
TBA MTWR 11:05am-12:20pm
4.0
LEGAL PRACTICE WORKSHOP II (Ash)
L6121, Section 2
TBA R 6:10pm-7:10pm
1.0
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW (Hamburger)
L6133, Section 2
TBA MTW 2:45pm-4:00pm
4.0
LAW, CULTURE, & NOTIONS OF JUSTICE (Williams)
L6179, Section 1
TBA MW 1:20pm-2:35pm
3.0
Total points : 15.0

Saturday, December 16, 2006

Wonderful Dream & Comment on Hapiness

I wanted to let followers of my blog who were concerned that my dreams were getting a LITTLE too crazy (my particular favourite was last week when I, as Celine Dion's best friend, had to mix the tubes for her artificial insemination) know that I had the most amazing dream last night.

I dreamed that I was in an old Mediterranean city (looked like Italy) with my Swissy who recently visited me for Thanksgiving (if I didn't blog about how amazing it was seeing him, it's because I was too busy having an amazing time -- and not amazing like "swept me off my feet crazy" amazing...it was a BETTER amazing, the kind that is more "it's amazing that we feel so comfortable and content by this"). In the dream, we were touring some kind of old historic sight, like a villa turned into a museum or something, and we were kind of short on time, because he'd made plans for us to go a chamber music concert and have dinner with friends. It was really cute, because he kept saying "I have to go to put on my tail feathers," because he wasn't sure how to say "tuxedo" in English (which makes no sense, because in French they actually call it "un smoking"), but he knew I was really enjoying the museum and didn't want me to have to go back and change, even though this concert he'd arranged was a really big deal.

It was so adorable how kind of insistent he was about wanting to dress up in his special jacket, but how at the same time he didn't insist that I do the same. I remember telling him "I can go change...let's go," and him sort of hugging me with his hand on the lower part of my back and saying "I'm looking at you now and I think you look perfect the way you are" (and I was totally wearing jeans) and he didn't say it in a totally cheesy fake way, but he said it in a really sincere "I accept you as you are" way, which is the feeling I got from him in person. We all have flaws and imperfections, and in the past I'd be really bothered by knowing, for example, that he really likes blond guys -- I'm not blond, and I'm therefore not his ideal, and in the past that would have hurt me, but NOW I can see that there is a difference between your abstract ideal and what you happily accept as wonderful-as-is in real life. I don't think he looks at me and says "it's too bad he isn't blond." I think he looks at me and is happy, and I feel the same way.

Ok back to the dream, so he rushes off to go put on this "tail feathers" (tuxedo), and I stayed until the museum closed (btw: in real life he's totally not into museums, which doesn't bother me at all, and I'm not sure he would ever wear a tuxedo to a chamber music concert either, but that's beside the point). So after he leaves and I and a few other people exit onto the street, there are like no taxis left, and I was a little stressed that I was going to be late looking for a taxi. Then, again why this dream was so nice, I just kind of said "it's ok...I can call him and let him know I'm going to be late and he's not going to judge me because he knows this isn't my fault and I'll get there in the first taxi available and we'll manage."

You can see that there were a lot of warmth, calmness, acceptance themes in this dream, which I think are key to all of our happiness (especially in a relationship).

When I got to the concert, he was as handsome as I knew he'd be (in real life, he's one of those people who every time I saw him, for the fist few seconds, my eyes would always be like "wow he's handsome") and we had an amazing time with his friends who were there.

Looking back on the dream, I can see that there were (unfortunately) some elements of my past relationship with Pookie creeping-in, because in the dream his friends were all his age, very sophisticated, and elegant, but also very warm and just happy people (one key difference is that in the dream there were a lot of straight couples, which does not really describe Pookie's set very well: friends from Harvard and ex-boyfriends).

After the dinner, I'm not really sure what happened in the dream (and no I'm not censoring it because my mom reads this -- I really don't remember what happened! lol) but I do remember that we went back to California (Swissy's DREAM is to be in California -- ironically, he feels as at home there as I do in Switzerland...), and then I had another really nice part of my dream, which is that my mom and I were just walking and talking and I remember remarking that we were both wearing sleeveless shirts and enjoying the warm weather one evening. It was so serene and just very calm and contented.

The whole dream was wonderful in that way. Happy people, but happy in a calm way (not ecstatic). Everyone was just very serene and at peace. I kind of miss that feeling, actually. I think more and more, now (probably because I'm studying for finals) that I am going to work really hard after I graduate to build THAT kind of life. It's not about following the path of going from the most elite law school to the most difficult-to-get high-paying job, to each new competitive milestone I can find in order to be officially selected as unique/special/worthy. In reality, managing to be happy puts one amongst a much more select few than does becoming a multi-millionaire or UN representative. It's sometimes hard to remember that. I think, though, that it might be internal knowledge of that (how truly difficult it is to be happy) which makes me seek out the other things so obsessively -- I wonder if there's not something inside me that says "it's too hard to be happy in fact, but you are capable of wining lots of other things that other people dream about, so do that, and you can be happy by default -- society will be happy about you FOR you."

This isn't to say that I can't one day have it all, but it's to say that I can't start at the wrong end with things. I should focus my efforts on priming myself for happiness (making myself into the kind of person who is a good friend and partner) and spend less time priming myself for success, because the fact is, some of us are likely to feel like we are always succeeding but never successful (never having enough), and that's a very obvious trap that I don't want to fall into.

In sum: wonderful dream; working on happy.

VC

Dolphin Tricks

I've just realized that I am incapable of doing ANYTHING without dessert.

As I was just telling Curie on the phone, I don't just need dessert after dinner, but I need it before and after starting any task.

Need to get myself to study? Better give myself dessert.

Need a reward to push myself to finish studying? Better have a dessert waiting for myself.

I'm like one of those dolphins that can do all kind of tricks but that you have to give fish to after EVERY one!

VC

Thursday, December 14, 2006

YLS Case Study

Proof that brilliant people are way less hot than people of average intellectual capacity...and have no fashion sense:














From the Yale Law School homepage

VC

Torts Notes Bloopers

As I wind-down my outline for my Torts exam, tomorrow (Thursday), I thought I'd give an example of some of my embarrassing typos that may only be funny to me, but are making me laugh.

We talk a lot about the "functional goals of tort law," but I seem to be fond of referring to them as "the functional goals of COURT law," because apparently I think when two words rhyme they are synonymous. I think it's for that reason that I sometimes just talk about "the la" rather than "the law," although I could me making a sophisticated commentary on music theory on the note to follow "so."

One of the cases in which we study sovereign immunity, Berkowitz, is repeatedly referred-to in my notes more-provocatively as "Berkotitz."

Finally, in my bondage-and-domination S&M study of employer liability, I say that employees are "better able to avoid the FIST," rather than "the risk."

looooooooool

VC

Tuesday, December 12, 2006

Leona's Rainbow

It's really unlike me to endorse an artist who I don't know a ton about, but I feel compelled to expose you all to this British artist, Leona, who is currently tearing it up on Idol creator Simon Cowell's show in England, X Factor.

I originally heard of her from the Perez Hilton blog (one of the funnier blogs devoted to celebrity trashing) since the Perezers are in love with her, too.

She apparently does a lot of writing of her own stuff, and is an all-around talent (not to mention multiethnic, gorgeous, well-spoken, etc. -- she's even wearing a print dress that I actually like!). It will be interesting to see where she takes everything in her career.

Anyway, the reason I'm blogging about her is that I *love* seeing an artist take a song that has been done millions of times and TOTALLY make it their own, especially when it works. It requires such talent (and courage). Anyway, I was reluctant to watch her version of "Somewhere Over the Rainbow," because it's such a special song for my mother and I, and Rufus does a version, and it's just not something to be messed with. Although her vibrato is a bit slow for my taste, I have to say that the choices she makes are just incredible. So unpredictable and yet it works so well. I also think it's nice to see an artist demonstrate not just range in pitch but range in dynamics as well -- she really can build the song, contract it, move it along...it's fantastic. Here it is :)

VC

Friday, December 08, 2006

Contracts Tomorrow

Well this is my last post before my first law school exam! :)

I'm trying to either see this as an exciting opportunity to excel and win even more praise for my ridiculous intelligence, or alternatively to see it as something relatively small that doesn't mean much and doesn't warrant any positive or negative emotion. I figure both of these trains of thought would be better than the "oh my god I'm so nervous and this is such a huge deal" approach that most of the other 1Ls are sharing.

It's an 8 hour exam and will have two or three questions that ask me to take on different roles and spot substantive issues of contracts law as applied to the fact pattern presented (the professors try to be cute, but the questions are usually pretty boring and tedious). The professor says that it should only take 4 hours to write, but that we should spend 2 hours just reading it and thinking about our response, another hour editing (there are strict length maximas) leaving an hour to eat and "travel" lol. I thought it was funny that he said "travel."

Anyway, I'm only blogging so that if you read this you can send me good vibes (between 10AM and 6PM Friday) and also to say that I just got a really good omen for the exam:

I had 5 practice exams and model answers left to print and had just put some fresh paper into my printer. Wouldn't you know that the last page of the last answer was my last piece of paper?

I think it's so neat when stuff like that happens.

Well my printer is now re-loaded and ready for tomorrow's exam, and I'm looking forward to either tearing it up and giving the model answer, or doing very averagely and trying not to care.

XO

VC

Law School Angst

Ok I have been sleeping 10 hours a night, and this material is not that difficult, and I'm not miserable, but I am wondering what the hell I am doing.

I cannot STAND having to devote so much money and time to something I don't seem to care about at all, and I find some of these practice exams to be maddening. Just making myself read the questions reminds me of the feeling I have when I've done all the research for a paper -- the interesting part -- and then it's time to sit down and write it. I'm not interested in applying my knowledge. My knowledge is in my head because I felt like putting it there; bothering to learn something is a pretty selfish process, and if I don't feel like I want to know something, then I don't bother learning it. That said, having to reproduce the stuff that I learned for myself and for no other purpose than my intellectual interest totally goes against this principle of hedonistic learning. I get nothing (NOTHING) from writing down what I think, or applying my knowledge to someone else's fact patter than I don't care about. It's like charity, or eating food you don't want to eat.

Ok back to my practice exam. Rant over.

VC

Wednesday, December 06, 2006

Hannukah Bush

I'm not sure if I've ever blogged about my small obsession with different covers of "A Song for You," my current favourites being, of course, Cher and Donny Hathaway, but I've just found a new version that I like very much.

The ONLY episode I saw of American Idol after college had a guy who I thought had an amazing voice and I later found out finished third, Eliot Yamin, and I just found this clip of him performing a version of the song that is clearly a copy of Hathaway and is quite QUITE good (especially considering the fact that he's had no vocal training).

Not the point.

Keep in mind when I try to say why I'm laughing that the guy's name is Elliot YAMIN and he couldn't look any more Hebrew -- I mean he looks like the Red Sea parted RIGHT before he walked onto the American Idol stage lol -- his mother being an American jew and is father an Israeli of Iraqi descent.

Anyway, the reason that I'm cracking up is that on his myspace page one of the comments he got (it's the second one down and you CAN'T miss it) is from this woman Lisa (careful if you click on it -- she has crazy guitar music) who says she hops (not hopes) that Yamin and his family will have a great Christmas with a HUGE electronic Christmas wreath. looool She's not only a little clueless but she's also a traitor -- on her my space page she lists the guy who beat Yamin as one of the three men in the world she wants to meet, and totally leaves out poor Elliot.

Mazel tov, Lisa!

VC

2nd Tier Ivy

I've HAD IT with Columbia.

Just because it's nearly located in a ghetto (which it's trying to buy-out, but is complaining because now that Bronxville knows that Columbia is buying everything and gentrifying the area they are holding out for higher prices) doesn't mean that it has to BE ghetto.

Yesterday, the student lounge at the law school (the ONLY quiet study lounge, which I like a lot) was off limits because they had to clean it. Couldn't they clean it off-hours or, I don't know, NOT in the middle of the day during reading week? On the other hand, I actually had to wipe-down my carrel in the library, yesterday, with a wet paper towel because all the dust was making me sneeze.

Today the lounge was AGAIN closed because there was a special event that was using it...I mean that lounge usually holds like 30 students, and today the entire floor outside it (which easily hosts another 60 students when its full) was also closed for the conference.

FINE.

I went to the School of International and Public Affairs (SIPA) library, which I like even though it feels VERY cold war (like you can sort of imagine really important scholars sitting around in the late 70s and early 80s talking about things, there), but the private study room I went to (it's like a phone booth with a chair) didn't have a functioning light. How hard is that to change with a support crew like Columbia's which may very well have more than 100 people working for it?

I then decided to just sit at one of the long shared-tables and was horrified to see that there is only one outlet -- ONE -- on the entire lower floor. Keep in mind there are probably 50 seats, maybe more. Combining ALL the carrels and tables and lounge area there is ONE outlet. It's just disgusting.

Anyway, THIS is the meaning of a second tier ivy. It's a school that had all the history and Nobel prize winners and founding fathers as the top tier ivys but was too lazy to get its act together to create the best environment meriting the most generous donations from alums. I'm not saying other universities don't have problems, but there is a weird complacency that comes with being solidly second tier, but still ivy, that I feel is unique to Columbia and probably a few other places. I walk along college walk, or down the stairs in SIPA or the law school, and it feels like the place is decaying at a rate faster than it's being maintained (let alone improved) and that's a really disheartening thing.

On a more positive note, I quickly organized my CDs and DVDs (still have a LONG way to go in terms of labeling, though) and came across the backup CD from my interim computer I was using at the end of my time in Cairo that I then sold to Glam. This CD is really important because it has ALL my India photos, all my Israel/Palestine photos, my text messages and phone photos, AND a lot of academic work, including the humanitarian law in Iraq paper that I wrote and was desperately looking for (and now found one day too late for the summer job aps I sent out yesterday).

VC

Tuesday, December 05, 2006

Weird Dreams

Well I have been meaning to post the past two days, because I've had really vivid and disturbing dreams that I've told some of you about, and now that, for the third night in a row, I've had more really vivid dreams, I thought I'd finally blog about it.

Since my time is really limited, I'm just going to briefly recap the first two nights.

Dream One

Two nights ago, when I was spending a really nice night with DC Guy after having seen Chorus Line (it was only so-so, but he LOVED it, so I pretended like it was really good until we got into substantive critiques over dinner), and eaten a nice meal at Sapa (which he shouldn't have let me pay for), I was all cuddled-up by DC Guy when I had the most awful Pookie-related dream.

I think it's because he text messaged me a few days ago (replying, of course, to an email I'd sent almost a month earlier), but really I don't feel bothered by what happened with him. It's a little disappointing, but it reflects much more on him than on me, so I don't let myself get too down or self-critical about it, and it's not something I've been mourning at all.

Anyway, the dream: I was living in Cairo in this gorgeous (seaside?) apartment with Shakira (the fact that a Cairo apartment could be by the sea, and Shakira could keep it clean, both would alert anyone to the fact that this is a DREAM), and I kept getting phone calls from friends in NYC telling me that they were spotting Pookie with a new guy. There was all this tension/hesitance/tragedy in their voices. It was really odd.

The call that I remember the most, which was the last one, was from Curie. I asked her if the new guy was better looking than I was, and she was like "well I only saw him for a minute, and it's hard to say..." and I was like "Curie, is he traditionally better looking than I am," and she said "yes." I hung up the phone and just fell to my knees in a ball on floor and was sobbing, feeling first like I wanted to immediately fly back to NYC and see it for myself, and then feeling like I just wanted to die...and then I woke up.

HOW MESSED UP IS THAT? I don't even think about him every day, and when I do, I'm certainly not worried that he's with someone else. If he had the ability to be with anyone, which I don't think he does (actually: I think he does, but I think he doesn't let himself use it), then I'd applaud the personal progress that would entail. What I think, though, is that anyone he's likely to be with at this point will just feed his old patterns and defense mechanisms, and I'm definitely NOT jealous of that.

Our hairdresser, who I introduced Pookie to as a Valentine's Day gift right when we first started dating, is always wanting to talk about him, telling me about how he doesn't want to be with me because he wants to screw around, and about how he has told him that he goes out and has sex etc. and the first time it happened (when I first came back to NYC) it kind of hurt, but now that Pookie (I really need to think of a new name for him) has proven to be a pretty disinterested party, it doesn't hurt at all. The last time I was getting my haircut I just said "well good for him!" and tried to make it as clear as possible that he was not something I wanted or needed to talk about.

When I woke up from my dream and felt DC Guy's arms around me, I remembered that I had a lot to be thankful for, and it's ok that Pookie is not one of them.

Dream Two

This dream was also highly stressful, but just sounds funny when I repeat it to people. Basically, I was a Supreme Court clerk for some judge that doesn't exist in real life, and although the dream started out with us going to stressful dinner meetings (and him warning me ahead of time that "New York shrimp is yellow in the middle, and the dipping bowl will be on the left side, so don't embarrass me" ... me telling him that I'm allergic to iodine, but I'd try) -- and there was a subplot about me really liking some red-headed guy (weird!) who was at the restaurant one of the nights, but I couldn't find his number for our date after that, and I was with a girlfriend who was always running late and was afraid we'd miss him -- but it then became a re-enactment of the Titanic.

All the justices and clerks were on a HUGE ship (like, bigger than any cruise ship I've seen) and we had to share quarters with them. My judge and I were trying to nap, but I was nervous and not happy with the sleeping arrangements, so I went up to the deck where we could exit to the shore where we were docked. Just as I was thinking of going onto shore, something happened with another ship that caused it to sink, and us to quickly realize (but only after we were already undocking) that we were going to sink, too. All the people on deck like I was were scrambling to get down the ramp and jump onto the shore before we'd sailed too far, but I was worried that all all the US Supreme Court judges would drown, below deck, and I was also worried that it would look really bad if, while the ship was sinking, I escaped without warning my judge. I was running around through all the chaos that you can imagine from the Titanic movie, trying to make my way back down to our quarters (which, incidentally, shared the same room number as my apartment number in real life -- 911), but I was so distraught and there was so much chaos, with people running the other way to get up and out of the ship and me running down, that I couldn't find the way to our quarters. Where the dream got really ridiculous was when I ran into the comic, Sinbad, and asked him to show me the way, which he did, at which point I woke up.

Dream Three

This was really two dreams, and they weren't that traumatic at all, but they were VERY involved. I think it's totally my fault, because before I went to sleep I was thinking about how my favourite psychic, Sylvia Brown, often explains that feeling you get when you wake up and your eyes are open but you are still caught a bit in the dream and are paralyzed, as you waking up before your spirit has returned from astral travel...she says that many people don't experience this, because often times when our spirit leaves our body it just boringly floats up to the ceiling and looks down at our sleeping bodies, below (which people do often remember). Anyway, before I slept, I was like "if you want to go somewhere, don't go someplace boring." Well I REALLY didn't, although I think the first part was the only real traveling, and the second part was a regular dream.

In the first part, I started off East of India, I think in Bangladesh, and I don't know why I was there, but I remember sort of flying over all this countryside really fast (like in a movie when you see, from the bottom of a plane, all the land speeding by underneath) and I landed in Afghanistan. I was really happy to be there, but I remember thinking that I had until the next day to get back, and really had a strong desire (my dream is so weird!) to go to Islamabad. Since I was only kind of part body and not really confined to regular physical constraints, I was able to kind of float across the border to Pakistan, at which point I think maybe I was dreaming and not astral traveling (not that it matters) because I sort of came back into my body in order to get some kind of travel visa. This was not a regular government visa place...picture the kind of chaos of booths and games and stuff at a carnival, except instead of ping-pong throwing and frog-flipping games it's government offices, and very rural Pakistanis with their livestock wandering around, etc.

I remember being sort of startled when the woman at the visa counter called me (because, to that point, I was not really a regular person, walking around) and I was quickly scanning the sign above her stall to see if any of the options applied to me. The had, oddly, a $4 1.5 day visa option, and I was asking her if I could get that, and if so, if the 1.5 days (it's sort of 1.5 days = 1.5 trips, so you can't move through multiple places during that period) would cover me getting to Islamabad through Rawalpindi and getting back to the airport (I was concerned that that would be 2 trips) and she said it was fine. I was shocked that it was so easy, especially since I obviously didn't have a passport with entry stamps to Pakistan OR Afghanistan, and it was kind of eerie, because she said to me "don't worry, you can go back tomorrow when you need to," but then she saw that I didn't have some kind of pre-visa "towns approval" thing that I needed at a different office, first, and was kind of disgusted by my unawareness of the bureaucratic process. When I was directed to the towns approval office, it was clear that I'd never get my approval and get back in time, so I was kind of worried at first about what I would do -- was I then stuck in Pakistan illegally? I started to get restless as things were getting chaotic in the dream, and I realized that I could try to fly back through Afghanistan, which is what I was doing when I woke up, except (exactly as I didn't want to happen, since I hate it!) I was really paralyzed and couldn't properly wake up. I was struggling not to fall back into the sleep, but I couldn't move my hands or feet and couldn't make a sound...as I started to return to awakeness I could wiggle my fingers and kind of make the feint long-vowel sounds that a deaf person would make, but it wasn't fun. I was like "ok when you go back to sleep, no more traveling, and if you do travel, don't wake up before your spirit is back" lol.

When I went back to sleep I had a fairly involved dream about being here at Columbia with a Japanese friend from Cairo during some huge festival. I'd just purchased a bike, and was cycling around everywhere even in the rain, and we had to keep going to different parties and events on campus, and even out to this gigantic water park (at night) that was more elaborate than any water park that exists in real life. I don't remember much of what this part of the dream really focused on (certainly the sub-plot about me not having a bike lock is not that important) but the bike did make it to the next travel episode.

In the next portion of my dream, my sister was traveling with me, and it was again weird because we were both kind of flying around not sure where we were going. We talked about maybe going to Turkey, or some other place, and after a series of events that I don't remember well, we kind of emerged in front of a non-existent in real life red palace that I recognized as being in Istanbul (here's where the dream is REALLY weird: I knew all the historical sites because I'd been there before, but it must have been in a prior dream, because these places don't exist in real life...the other weird thing is that in Istanbul they had a lot of relics related to the Virgin Mary, which doesn't make much sense, and which I'll describe more in a minute).

So my sister and I emerged in Istanbul, and I kind of remember the hotel where we were staying (that wasn't like a big Marriott or something, but was more traditional Turkish, and our mother may have been there) being two subway stops (again: not real Istanbul) from the historic sites.

We first went to a small structure outside the palace, at which point my sister was temporarily replaced by Curie, and I remembered as we were going in that, when I'd been there before, it was the site of a tile upon which Mary had supposedly given birth (I know this is weird!). I also remembered that I was sort of put-off by the way the Turkish government had arranged the tour of it. Well Curie and I originally went to a viewing station up above the tile, which was annoying because they'd put a rainbow glass filter between the viewing station and the tile, for effect, so when you looked down onto it the tile had a rainbow on top (very lame).

I remembered how to get down to the actual chamber where the tile was, and sure enough (as I'd remembered) it was awful what the Turkish government was allowing people to do -- they'd leased-out the space to Christian proselytizers who had the tile, which was actually a small tapestry, under a huge magnifying glass while they were playing horrible acoustic Christian music (the kind you'd have in a middle America church on Sunday) and talking about Christianity. They were basically trapping all the tourists into a sermon. I was shocked when they actually had Sarah and I touch the tapestry (thinking that they couldn't let all the tourists do that, and had no authority to permit it, when it's such an old piece of fabric), and then actually tried to sell us replica weavings in the same style! I noticed that the color scheme on the tapestry (brown, black, and red) was really unlikely to be what people actually wore 2000 years ago, and called them out on it. They then tried to say that Mary was actually part of a Bacchus-worshiping sex cult that did wear the outrageously-coloured garments, at which point Curie and I told them we thought it was a ridiculous thesis to assert that Mary, at 14, would have been part of a Bacchic cult, and we left.

My sister was then back, and we were debating where to go next in the palace. Since I'd been there before and knew the signage inside wasn't very good, I kept offering to get on my bike (I told you it would return!) and go back to the hotel and get our Lonely Planet book (which, while flying over, we obviously didn't bring with us). She insisted that I didn't need to, and while we were standing at the entrance to the palace I got a call from the friend who took me to Montreal in August (who, in real life, has been to Turkey countless times). Apparently I'd double-booked, and agreed to meet him in Turkey if we were there at the same time. I was dreading seeing him, and just wanted to be with my sister because we have SO much fun, anything but being with her would be second best, and as I was so focused on a plan to get rid of him, I totally forgot that she was waiting for me! At one point I was like "WHERE IS MY SISTER?" and he was like "I guess you left her at the entrance to the hotel." I ran back, and she was a little mad, but understood when I explained that I was so fixated on brushing him off that I'd forgotten to go back and get her.

My sister and I then began our tour of the palace, which had its own museum (including a rotating modern art collection), and I remembered the layout of the entire museum, and even recognized part of the permanent collection. I was explaining to my sister how they rotate everything around and where my favourite artist's stuff was (this woman who did a lot of great paintings with roses in them, but not as the central focus) and then I woke up!

Well this took me nearly an hour to type so I hope you have read this far lol.

Dreams are crazy, aren't they?

VC

PS: I just remembered, when I started to edit this for spelling errors, that before Curie and I left the place with Mary's tapestry I wrote a letter to the Turkish government saying how awful I thought it was that they were permitting Christian groups to rent out the place and do what they were with the tile (pretending it was a tapestry, Bacchus, the rainbow, etc.) and I remember when I handed it to Curie and she saw how strongly-worded it was she was like "god help us" lol, and it was as if she was one of the people who read the letter I wrote in real life to Cairo's Grand Hyatt about the gym, because she made a reference to it. She didn't get, at first, that we had to protest to the Turkish government, though, because it was they who were turning a profit by renting the space out to the proselytizing group!

Wednesday, November 29, 2006

The Insanity of Madame Wong

Since I haven't taken the time to update everyone on my recent thoughts/experiences (trust me, you're missing out on A LOT ;p), I wanted to just briefly give you a bit of insight and entertainment with the unauthorized publication of a very cute email I mojust received from my mother. I think you can see where I get it:

Hi Warker,

I thought you might be interested to hear about how my “beyond positive thinking” is going and how odd it is the way things manifest themselves. I did everything last night to save time this morning so I could exercise. Lots of times I “forget” to even think about exercising, but it was really on my mind and planned for. I had trouble sleeping last night (which is kind of unusual anymore but it seems to happen when I take my multi-vitamin before bed instead of during the day…probably only psychological). I almost always wake up before my alarm goes off and when it finally rings I’m really ready to watch TV for only a few minutes and then go into action making my bed, flossing, etc. (Don’t you love all the details?). Anyway, this morning when my alarm rang it seemed it was the first time I was actually sleeping well and I turned off my alarm and went back to sleep for a while.

My thoughts about this are that my subconscious sabotaged my plan to exercise.

Believe me, it was really strong and up front in my conscious mind and every time I woke up during the night I remembered that I wanted to workout when I got up.

Then…on to the morning McDonald’s cookies. I figure if I only have them on Monday and Friday, as my little rewards, then it’s ok. And I knew that if I had worked out there was no way I was going to stop and buy cookies; however, I didn’t work out and therefore said to myself that I would have them anyway. Also unusual…I hit almost every single stop light red on my way to work which shouldn’t have allowed me to have time to stop at McDonald’s (but I did). Then, I really wasn’t interested in the cookies, although I was hungry, and by 10:30a.m. I had only eaten one.

So…here I am seesawing back and forth moving both forward and backward in a total mind game. It is very interesting and I’m enjoying kind of observing (or guessing) what is going on in my mind(conscious and subconscious).

Probably too much detail to read, but I don’t have anything else to write about!

XXXXXXXXXXXXXOOOOOOOOO

Mommie

*******

VC

Saturday, November 11, 2006

Sound Familiar?

type A behavior
n.

A behavior pattern characterized by tenseness, impatience, and aggressiveness, often resulting in stress-related symptoms such as insomnia and indigestion and possibly increasing the risk of heart disease. Also called type A personality.

hahahahaahahah

VC


Tuesday, October 31, 2006

Deceptive Workload & Time Managment

Since I'm in the middle of my second all-nighter in a row (although I did nap for 5 hours, today, so it's not like I've been awake for 48 straight), I wanted to just say: This is not because law school is overwhelmingly difficult or we have too much reading.

It's really about time managment.

I woke up from my nap at 5PM, went to dinner at 8PM (with a 1/2 Persian 1/2 Afghan doctor!) in the Meatpacking District (no giggles!) at a restaurant I'd been to in 2004 with a Swiss friend called Nero, got home at 11:30PM, and had my school stuff together, work set-out, coffee in hand, and was sitting down at my desk here in the library a bit before 2AM.

That's 9 hours straight of not working.

Since I'll finish my work, but only thanks to staying up all night, that means that I could have slept for 9 hours and STILL finished my work had I wasted no time at all, or I could have even had a 2 hour dinner and gotten 7 hours sleep, or a 1 hour dinner and 2 hours at the gym and gotten 6 hours of sleep.

Law school isn't that bad, but you really can see the tradeoff between having a loose schedule and getting sleep.

If I immortalize it in a blog does it count as a lesson learned?

VC

Thursday, October 26, 2006

GLAM @ YLS

Check out this really interesting article about McKinsey's recruitment of gay Yale Law School students.

VC

Tuesday, October 24, 2006

Tautology of Pilates

I want to take just a couple minutes to debunk the myth that pilates will give you a long, slender physique. It's true that everyone who does it seriously has a long, slender physique, and so we assume that they are evidence that pilates works.

NO!

As I have now experienced on more than one occasion, you cannot do pilates unless you have a long, slender physique!!

In class, this evening, the instructor kept wanting us to do different variations of the same theme: crunch your bellybutton to your spine and move your spine as close to your thighs as possible. It takes many forms, from variations on the standard crunch, to rocking back and forth as a "scrunch" ball, to being an extended cow cat...or something like that. Anyway, what I realized every time she wanted us to scrunch up for this or that that I CANNOT scrunch myself the way she does! It's not that easy for me to put my chin over my knees, because that involves folding myself in half, and let's just saw that between my mid section and my thighs combined there is a lot of human matter getting in the way of the scrunch.

I really think only people who already have pilates bodies can do pilates at all, but I'm not giving up, yet. There were no hot guys in my class, unfortunately; in fact, I was the only guy in the class (there were only 5 of us), but there was a rather butch lesbian with killer back muscle!

Will I be 20lbs less chunky by Christmas? We'll see!

VC

Subway Performances

EVERY time I ride the train, now, there is a strung-out black junkie trying to sing for money. It's really awful. It's awful for the riders, and it's an awful statement about poverty and drug abuse in at-risk communities.

On a lighter note, Kelly rides the subway (she's a good acrtress on SNL!).

VC

Monday, October 23, 2006

Law School's Version of "Fun"

You must read the email, below, from CLS Student Services in order to see why it is that I (who admittedly am not super fun to begin with) do not think that the activities designed by the law school to be fun come anywhere near meeting the definition of the word.

You might think, at first, that they are saying "study a bit extra this weekend in order to NOT study during the night of fun we're planing," but you'd be wrong! What they actually mean is: "study extra this weekend so that you can excel at our totally un-fun game!"

I cannot believe the sample question.

***

We say:
Study a little extra next weekend.

You say:
WHY?

We say:
Well, because QUIZZO is on Monday, October 30 -- surely to go down as the
most fun, entertaining, enjoyable, amusing Monday in the history of
Columbia
Law School.


What you need to know:

-- Quizzo (CLS's version of a pub-style trivia night) is FREE.
-- Lenfest Café, 8 pm. Monday, October 30.
-- We've only got space for 20 teams of 5 people.
-- Register your team by emailing Andy Bradley (ajb2135@columbia.edu)
-- Feel free to attend either in your superhero costume or in your civilian
disguise
-- This round of QUIZZO is sponsored by Student Services, so we'll have
lots of food, drink, and fun. JOIN US!

Cheers,
Elizabeth, Andy, Mainon, & Colin (your quizmasters)

p.s.
Warmup Question:
Why are Secretary of Commerce Carlos Gutierrez & Secretary of Labor
Elaine Chao most likely not included in the U.S. Presidential line of succession?
(Scroll down for answer)

Warmup Answer:
3 U.S.C. § 19(e) specifies that even the acting president must meet the
constitutional requirements for the office of president. As Guterriez was
born in Cuba and Chao in Taiwan, they (most likely) do not meet the
requirement of Article II, Section 1. That section requires that the
Office of President be held by a natural-born citizen.

The same question would exist for officers in the line of succession who
are not at least 35 years old or have not resided in the United States for 14
years.

***

YIKES

VC

Name That Band

Ok I need the help of my blog readers to watch this clip from the PerezHilton blog and tell me what heavy metal band this is!

It's a bit ironic that it's AFTER Pookie and I no longer speak that his world of heavy metal and mine of Kelly Clarkson could actually come together!

It's a really long clip (like eight minutes) but I have to point out three things:

1. Kelly handled what could have been a REALLY humiliating situation (being spotted and then on-stage insulted and sexually harassed by some heavy metal band at a concert she was at) PERFECTLY (she basically faked it and managed to not look awkward at all)

2. She was perfectly uninhibited, so it neither looked like she was trying too hard, nor was she intimidated, and I think for someone with her image she demonstrated amazing coolheadedness and basically took charge and owned the situation.

3. Can we just mention the fact that even TRASHED (she's OBVIOUSLY wasted, and even says to the guy who pulls her on stage "I'm drunk," which is why he proceeds to say that they're all on different drugs), she out-sings all of them on their own song. I think it's a testament to her genius that she IMPROVISES HARMONY (on the first try) in "Oh Sweet Child of Mine" (it's worth watching just for that, MOM, since you think she isn't that good!) and then she totally captures the rock attitude even better than they do, later in the song.

It's an annoying clip, but as the PerezHilton blog says "bitch can throw it down!"

VC

Sunday, October 22, 2006

Oh Holy Night Awards

For most 24yo gay men in NYC the title of that blog entry might make you think that this posting is about ranking my many lovers. Unfortunately, I don't have a lot of material to work with on that front, so it's ACTUALLY a short blog about my favourite Christmas carol as sung by a few of my favourite divas.

1. The award for "Best coked-up 19yo diva with no sense of the meaning of the words she's singing, but possessing amazing virtuosity" goes (as one could imagine) to Christina Aguilera. She sang this version for President Clinton back in 1999 (and she has come a LONG way in terms of the choices she makes, musically, in the last seven years). I think it's hilarious that she's so concerned with getting an extra run in that she doesn't even complete the line, in the beginning, of "It is the night of our dear saviour's birth" -- it's more like "...of our dear saviour's birrr--Oh-OHH" lol. I think that her run at 1:00-1:01 on the word "night" is ridiculous, but also extremely impressive...I mean this girl grew up with NO vocal training. I feel bad posting this song, because it is BY FAR not one of her better performances, but I still find her amazing, and it does make me laugh how she missed the spirit of the song so completely...I mean she actually walks off stage before it's even over! The comment about her sounding like a constipated rabbit is also hilarious (sometimes the youtube comments are better than the clips, themselves).

2. The award for "Worst video of one of the best recordings ever" HAS to go to Mariah Carey. In this video, which she tries to market as live (and therefore mixes it differently [worse] than on the album) even though it isn't, Mariah, as one of the comments says (and is SO right!) demonstrates what an atrocious actress she is by sucking at pretending to sing her own song. The video is torture to watch, which is so sad, because her version of "Oh Holy Night" on her Christmas album is hands-down one of the best I've ever heard. I think, though, that you can see how her musical choices make a bit more sense than Christina's and Kelly's (the next one up), and I think that she's a good example of how the flip-flopping that people complain about as "vocal gymnastics" (lamest critique ever!) can actually come organically in the melody of a song such that it is used really effectively.

3. The award for "Gutsiest a capella performance by a then-emerging star in below freezing weather atop a Manhattan skyscraper" goes to Kelly Clarkson. I feel, in this performance , that even though her melodic choices are a bit weird, you can hear how rich her voice is and how her vibrato really spins. I think that her voice is actually much richer than both Christina's and Mariah's, and I think that if she didn't always have to sing pop-rock crap for record sales, people could see that she has every bit as much soul and ability as Aretha...even her head voice is really rich, and her vibrato still really spins up there. If you want a lesson in technique, then you need look no farther than Kelly. She suffers from vocal strain because she performs like 10 millions shows a year and REALLY gives her all, but she has (I believe) really incredible technique. In the FEW voice lessons that I had a few summers ago in NYC, my teacher would try to get me to practice this really trendy "speech level singing" technique (where you keep your larynx low, like when you're talking naturally, even through your upper register -- where it has the tendency to rise and create tightness/strain), and one of the things she'd tell me to do, which I didn't get at first, was reset the position of my larynx by crying into a note -- like she wanted me to kind of whimper, almost, before starting a note after a breath, and you can hear really good singers do that (which I never noticed until my voice teacher pointed it out), including Kelly, in this song, at 0:55 when she says "{whimper} a thrill of hope..." as well as at 1:12 when she says "fall {whimper} on your knees." She also does it almost imperceptibly at 1:06 as she enters the note for "a new and glorious morn' ." I keep listening to it, and I totally stand by my comment that just on a single pitch her voice is richer than anyone else out there (it's SO three-dimensional!).

4. My final award, the "Hooked on phonics purity of tone and vocal control award" has to go to Celine Dion. I think that this is BY FAR (by like a million miles) the most polished performance , and I have to say that the woman almost never, ever, EVER hits a bad note. She's one of the most dependable live performers alive (and also has miraculously little vocal strain). What impresses me about her is that she can belt like it's no one's business (4:28-4:38), but has SO much control that she can also almost whisper (1:48-1:57) and it's still tonally perfect and gorgeous (and as Curie says, never "thin" even at its most delicate). One of my favourite parts (in terms of it being bad) is at 1:00 ("A thrill of hope") where you can here EXACTLY why I could not stand her for so many years (and still can't, on any song where she has to sing the word "love"), which is that on her "Oh" sounds she raises the back of her tongue to her palette and creates an "ur" sound -- so instead of "love" it's "lurve," which I used to think was just because her English used to be pretty bad, but now, having heard her French songs, I've realized is just one of (perhaps the only) flaw in her technique. I think that this is the most stirring performance, and I beseech anyone reading this to please find a way to get me good seats to her concert in Las Vegas lol. I also should apologize to Celine for mocking her English, because I always thought that her saying, at 1:34 "oh her the angel-voices" that she was making a grammatical error and failing to add a possessive suffix and pluralize it to make it "angels' voices," but having heard all the other versions, I guess it's just originally written (awkwardly) as a compound noun. In my defense, though, you can actually SEE her struggling with the English pronunciation at 0:59 when instead of saying "and the soul felt its worth" she makes the "th" (which they don't really have much of in French" an "f" -- "and the soul felt its werf" (you can SEE her do it). Look, also, for the moment at 3:10 where Celine temporarily forgets that she's not at a Latin dance competition (not sure the arm movement really fit the mood of the piece at that moment).

Finally, and I'm only including this as part of my not-yet-declared campaign to rid America of bad taste, but here is Jessica Simpson's recording of the song. Why do we (Americans) waste money on people with NO talent and prop them up even when we have all the evidence we need to see through them? People supporting Ashley Simpson, even when it was clear she couldn't sing, even when it was clear that her reality show about her launch of her first CD was PART of Jessica's contract to continue on the Newleyweds, and even after she was caught lip synching on Saturday Night Live and RAN OFF STAGE and made a lame excuse for it, people STILL put her CD at #1...it's the SAME way Bush was re-elected after manifesting his incompetence for the first four years he was in office. Anyway, there are two things to note in this performance of Jessica's that can only be described as wretched beyond belief -- and characteristic of what her family considers to constitute "talent." First, note the Simpson technique that I call "baby voice"...not breathy in a good Lea Salonga way, or sexy in a Marilyn Monroe way...it's literally like a baby trying to be seductive and it's really disturbing. I don't need to point out specific segments in the performance that demonstrate this technique, because it's basically all throughout (and also represents most of what Ashley Simpson employs as a substitute for real singing -- that and yelling...); the second technique is what I call "strangled belt," which is when Jessica attempts to show off her diva range (and set herself apart from Ashely, who can't even manage the strangled belt!) but in the process is SO strained that she can barely get out some nasal and narrow and totally ugly vibrato. I REALLY cannot stand her. A good example of the strangled belt from the beginning of the song (since I don't think any human being should have to sit through the whole thing) can be found at 1:37. YIKES!

Well enough time-wasting aside. I should do SOMETHING with my day, now that it's 7:30PM. Maybe I'll go to the gym and not feel the oppression of ther guys who are usually there, since I'm guessing that they are using their chiseled bodies to have some fun on a Saturday night and won't be at the gym!

VC

Friday, October 20, 2006

Always On Your Side

For someone who I doubt very much reads this blog, anymore --

My yesterdays are all boxed up and neatly put away
But every now and then you come to mind
Cause you were always waiting to be picked to play the game
But when your name was called, you found a place to hide
When you knew that I was always on your side

Well everything was easy then, so sweet and innocent
But your demons and your angels reappeared
Leavin' only traces of the man you thought you'd be
Too afraid to hear the words you'd always feared
Leavin' me with only questions all these years

But is there someplace far away, someplace where all is clear
Easy to start over with the ones you hold so dear
Or are you left to wonder, all alone, eternally
This isn't how it's really meant to be
No it isn't how it's really meant to be

*********************

Always On Your Side

Wednesday, October 11, 2006

Salam Productivity, Khodahafez Farsi

Well I've made the not-so-difficult decision to drop the Farsi class that I was never allowed to take in the first place, mostly because I've been having to ditch it so frequently to go to law school events. There seems to be an endless stream of speakers, dinners, trainings, and other things that I want to go to (at least once per week) and I feel like, at least for now, I should put that stuff first. I know that our OutLaws dinner (tomorrow night) is not as important as learning a language, but on the other hand it's events like that which present our only option to interact with law school people outside the classroom (or study groups), and I think I should seize that chance.

The secondary reason (actually it ties in importance with the first reason) is that I feel like, while I don't have an unmanageable amount of work, I do have a really heavy commitment load. I feel like, for whatever reason, I'm just totally loaded down with obligations, and it's really a welcome day when ALL I have to do is go to class and have me time.

Since starting back to the gym at the beginning of last week (I think 4 times in 8 days is not great, but not awful, either -- and only 1 pizza!) I also realized that, if I leave for the gym after my last law school class, I can exercise and be back uptown in my apartment before I would have even gotten out of Persian. With there being less daylight hours, more work, more need to de-stress and run a few miles each day, and (sadly) the mind-numbing pedagogical style of my Persian professor (who is, otherwise, a total sweetheart), it is clearly the right decision to give myself more me-time, and not sacrifice productivity in a lot of spheres (social, study, gym...) for one language class that I was just doing for enrichment, anyway.

It might sound strange, but I'm actually surprised with how productive I've been, lately, as well as how un-stressed I've been. Even going into my Legal Methods exam, last Friday, I was pretty relaxed, and even after having slept only 10 minutes the night before, I came straight back from the exam and did my Human Rights Internship Program (HRIP) application (even though it was not due until this Monday), had it reviewed by the Center for Public Interest Law, and went out that night with friends. Basically every day, I've been getting much-needed things done (calling this office or that company or sending XYZ emails), in addition to exercising, cooking for myself, keeping up on laundry and dishes...it's really...odd.

I think that I'm actually moving towards an equilibrium where I'm in perfectly-dampened motion and can sort of continue, without much adjusting, as long as my life stays as balanced as it is, now -- it's weird how spending energy on some things has actually given me more energy to do other things (like being healthy kind of feeds itself in the same way that being unhealthy prompts more unhealthiness).

Enough singing my own praises :) Back to contracts [I actually went to office hours, today, and the Professor and I are reading through a book together that I went down to NYU, after class, to pickup -- it's very law and econ intensive, but so is he, so we'll see how that goes...at least I'm interacting with him outside class]

VC

Monday, October 09, 2006

Fighting Temptation

In case you are wondering how I can sleep 13 hours a day on the weekend, I think all you need to see is how plush my bed is (thanks to the down mattress pad AND the down blanket from Curie that we used to call in college "the cloud" because it's so heavenly).

I sit down on the bed and am giddy with how nice it is.

Anyway, just got back from Contracts where I was AGAIN on call (this is getting unfair to the other students!) although we joked around and it was actually kind of fun; when I set my bag down on the bed and saw it sink into the cloud, I just had to take a photo.

I think even the worst insomniac would not last 5 minutes in this bed.

VC

Friday, October 06, 2006

Weird Dreams (and Dates)

Ok I am definitely sleeping too much, because I have had THE weirdest dreams lately.

I can understand my dreams last night, because they related very closely to a odd (but nice) date I had last night.

Quick date wrap-up.

The good: he's handsome, intelligent, cares about art, and seems overall to be very good-natured (and he's not threateningly charismatic, which is usually what I'm attracted to, but which doesn't usually make someone such a great person); his dog really liked me (and I liked it, and it wasn't my standard type, either); he's very boundary-less in terms of going for what he wants, which is excellent -- example: asking an indoor restaurant that the dog "picked" by staring at it when we walked by if, in the pouring rain, they'd extend their awning and bring a table outside for us...which they did (I like someone who indulges his own particularities, because that means he's less likely to condemn me for indulging mine, so long as our spheres of particularity do not overlap, leading to a power struggle); his terrace goes all around the entire building and is, estimating conservatively, 6 or 8 times the size of my entire apartment (hey -- at least it's only the size of his balcony I'm concerned with!).

The bad: there no evidence that he's had a successful relationship in the past (sound familiar?); he's said that he's restricted all non-essential travel since getting his dog seven years ago so that he's not left alone ("he" being the dog); his 28yo assistant (straight and with girlfriend) is now moving into a house that he owns in Brooklyn, and has power of attorney (don't ask me how that comes about on a first date!); he does not email (his assistant reads and writes all of his emails).

The odd: he has been doing extensive renovations to an apartment which I'd been hearing about since before Labor Day, which I just found out last night are actually three apartments that constitute the entire floor of a building in Greenwich Village that *get this* he's renting -- he doesn't buy, because he says it's cheaper to rent and he can just walk away from a rental and it's not his problem...this coming from a guy who has knocked down walls, totally changed the floors, is having new cabinets installed, had all the air conditioners covered in bamboo and window sills lined with marble...AND IT'S NOT EVEN HIS! He has what is probably the most important collection of Russian avant-garde art in the world (and was pleasantly surprised that I knew of some of the painters from a previous life) but wants to sell the whole thing to a Russian (or multiple Russians) in political trouble and looking for valuable art as a bargaining chip (eg: "Dear Government, I'll give this Faberge Egg to the Hermitage if you don't nationalize my oil company.") He has to bring his own salt everywhere he eats, and not because he can't request sea salt from the chef (which of course he could) but because he needs special unrefined powder sea salt. He is so deathly allergic to dogs that he cannot even get the allergy shots that would increase his tolerance because having even a small amount of hair injected into his arm could kill him; nevertheless, seven years ago, he spotted a dog from across the street that he said he instantly knew was brilliant, and went to the guy with the dog and said "tell me about this dog," and the guy told him that he found it the day before with the police taking it to the pound, and couldn't keep it because he was leaving NYC; J then told the guy that he would take the dog, and (not to his surprise) even after not letting it on any furniture, washing all the time after he touches it, and having restricted areas of the house where it can never ever go, he lost 70% of his lung capacity within a few weeks -- the solution? Steroid shots twice daily. [Note: this is why, when he invited me a Juicy MD to a concert of Phillip Glass, who I didn't know at the time is one of his best friends, in the Hamptons, he said that she wouldn't have to worry about the dog, because it's not allowed to go to the main part of the house...since he is also allergic to his own dog!]

In all, he seems like someone who has a lot of potential, but the date was really halted by these long pregnant pauses in which he'd just grin at me (or not at me), which under normal circumstances would be romantic (if a bit off-putting), but last night I learned meant: "I'm thinking about how cute the dog is right now." It was hard for us to talk about ANYTHING, because we were so focused on the dog...how smart he is (he is REALLY well-trained even though he was never actually trained at all and is a total sweetheart)...how he performs cost benefit analysis ("do I take the treat or insist we walk the direction I want to walk?")...how he takes contracts seriously ("if I take the treat then I can't trick J and make him walk my direction anyway. I have to agree to go the way he wants to go")...how he makes instant value judgments about people that J trusts, etc. It was really good for me that the dog loved me, but I feel like it was hard for me to get to know J not only because his life itself doesn't fit into the standard boxes we grab on to when we get to know someone (I mean, someone who doesn't work per se, but rather "works" at watching his investments and his art collection, and who doesn't talk much about either -- you can't ask him about his day!), but also because he just isn't that easy to talk to because we had to be so distracted by the (extremely cute) dog.

Sidenote: "our" dog started playing with another dog (kind of at my request) which is perhaps the cutest white puff of a thing I've ever seen. It was an American Eskimo. Remember that.

Ok so the dreams (is it obvious that I'm procrastinating before my Legal Methods exam in 16 hours?...I have a second date with a nice Israeli tonight, actually!). I had a REALLY restless sleep last night because I dreamt that I was at J's house, except he not only had pets (many of them -- some of them odd found-objects and other things that are NOT, in real life, pets, but had somehow come to life in the dream) but also children, and I had to sort of be tested by all of them to see how well I could handle all his pets and kids, while going from room to room in this house filled with art oddities. It was just...really odd. I'd be, like, chasing a tiny rainbow coloured crocodile with one of his ethnically-mismatched daughters (REALLY a weird dream!) and then have to stop in front of some antique mirror and, like, be amazed by it in order to be properly respectful to his space. It was VERY odd.

I just took a nap after brunch wherein I dreamed that my nieces (kind of), some of their friends (kind of), and some random people from my law school (again, they were sometimes there, sometimes not, and I don't really know most of them in real life) came to my mother's place in CA for Thanksgiving *along with* a group of traveling nuns trying to recruit the girls in the group to join the convent. I remember that our house was REALLY cluttered (eg: with glasses with formal napkins in them, unwashed, etc.) -- which is SO not how my mother has her house -- and that even though the dinner went really well, I found my mother crying in my walk-in closet, talking about what a failure it was and how she wanted everything to be perfect (ok that part could actually happen in real life lol). When I started to reassure her that everyone had a great time, she then tried to find the silver lining in the nuns, and said "well at least they make us take the girls out to see the world before they are allowed to commit themselves to the convent, unlike the ones who came to Webb [my high school]" (weird since that never happened) at which point my mother and I both put black pillow cases over our heads, folded in the back, to see what we'd look like as nuns, and then joined the rest of the party. The dream then became about how we were, like, flying the girls all over the world so that they could make an informed decision about joining a convent, and the last thing I remember, after an extremely vivid (and fun) take-off in the middle of a lightening storm (it was like blasting off in a rocket ship) was waiting in line for coffee on the plane, disappointed that they only had one little chocolate cracker thing to offer by the time they gave me my snack, and it was ruined because it had orange marmalade stuff on it.

Have to study before my date! I'm going to tell the Israeli that we have two hours for dinner and then I *have* to come back and study for my Legal Methods exam (which is just pass/fail, but still). He invited me to a gallery opening, but I'm going to be disciplined and stay home and only meet him for dinner.

VC

PS: To anyone who has doubted my ability to move-on post-Pookie, please kiss it. There's a difference between loving someone and being a fool. I love Pookie and wish that we had some involvement in each other's lives (even non-romantic) but we don't, and it's a choice he made that I'm not going to cry over or foolishly fret about. The loss may not be entirely his, but the choice was, and he's old enough that if he wants to continue to make the same mistakes that he's made throughout his life and then lie to himself about what they mean, then he should be able to do that.

Wednesday, October 04, 2006

Stuffing My Face at Midnight

No, I wasn't breaking my diet -- I was keeping it!

So after getting back from the gym, last night, and downing a huge can of green beans in its entirety, I added up my calories for the day, which, before expending 300+ calories at the gym, was only 540. NOT GOOD. I don't care what kind of diet you're on, having a deficit of almost 2000 calories at the end of the day is not healthy or sustainable. So, at midnight, I finally had the reserve to go to the market and MAKE myself buy food that I could eat before bed. It was actually kind of like a game -- what products to buy that could add up to give me the calories I needed for the day (my target is about 1460) while maximizing nutrition and fullness. I ended up cooking myself some tortellini (which I couldn't even eat half of -- those green beans were filling!), having a protein drink with some lactose-free milk (testing out the theory that I might be lactose intolerant), and some rice crackers covered in wasabi (LOVE THOSE!).

It was really kind of funny that I was exhausted and wanted to sleep but had to eat!

Diets are odd things.

On more food news, I have discovered that tea is AMAZING! Zero calories and it doesn't require sugar to be potable (unlike coffee), and still can give you the pep you need to be called on AGAIN in Contracts.

A friend of mine was making fun of me after class, today, because when I'm called on I get all quiet and nervous (surprising, I know), but it's honestly because I'm given questions that are too easy! I was all prepared to describe a complicated multi-step application of a part of the Universal Commercial Code (so complicated that the professor even gave us a huge flow chart to help us navigate it), but instead was asked about the method by which a particular contract was formed in one of our cases (that we were supposed to read for yesterday, of course) and I was stuck for a minute, trying to conjure up some theory of contract formation, when I was like "you mean by telephone?" Yes. He just wanted to know how one party contacted the other (which, for the record, was not even material to this case).

I promise to not annoy you with BOTH diets and law school (I figure restricting myself to the first topic will be sufficiently tedious to my readers), but I just think it's funny how in the past two days I managed to define myself, to my surprise, as the shy guy who struggles with easy questions and doesn't do the torts reading...talk about poorly representing myself!

Too bad :)

VC

Hop on the Bus

Thanks to Vanine for for alerting me to John Cameron Mitchell's Shortbus movie opening!

I'm so excited to see what he's done to follow-up Hedwig and the Angry Inch.

This movie doesn't sound so much my taste as, say, Desi's, but I feel like JCM is so talented that it will be good. So I'm seeing it.

So should you.

VC

Worst Day in Law School History

I was on call for all three of my classes (on call not meaning "warned in advance that today would be my day" but rather that I was cold-called in all of them).

Contracts went fine. We have an oddly good relationship even though I'm not one of his favourite females and he has clerked with two of the most audaciously conservative ("economics-minded," "originalists" pick your euphemism) judges on the planet (Posner and Scalia).

Civ Pro started bad (the question she asked was so simple that I thought there must be more to it), but ended up fine (or so I thought) even though she was asking me about a case that just appeared as a note to another case and that we were supposed to read days ago.

Torts was where it all ended. We have never, EVER gotten through all the reading assigned for class, so while I haven't fallen behind in the class, I do enter each day a little behind, but at the end of the day HE is behind us (so each day we are picking up the slack from the day before and you know that if you've done the reading from the prior day, which I had, then 80% of the next day's reading will be plenty).

Well we have a supplement to the book that you have to download online, and to make a long story short, when he called on the guy next to me (which in Torts means that I'll be called next) he skipped ahead three cases to the end of today's reading, a reading from the supplement. The guy next to me had to pass, at which point the professor (this is his version of angry) made a little comment about he thinks that he assigns less reading than other professors, and then asked me if I could answer, which I couldn't. It was SO bad. I mean the worst moment to have to pass, because he was already mad, and it was about a sensitive thing (the supplement). When other students pass it just means "didn't know the specific answer" but in this case it seemed (to him) to mean "I don't read anything from the supplement."

You may recall that this is the professor I have the huge crush on.

After class a guy in my section was like "tough day, VC" and then on the way home he proceeded to elaborate: "Well...I guess you weren't that bad in civ pro...not as bad as some of the others" and even went on to say: "What happened to you today is my worst nightmare...that's all I can say...my worst nightmare."

I told him thank god the exams are graded blindly, and that it's not SUCH a huge deal (it feels like it is, but I know that it isn't) and he was like "yeah, I guess it's not the end of the world," to which I replied: "It's not even CLOSE to the end of the world...it's not even half way there."

People have no perspective.

I'm going to the gym, which will mean that I've successfully avoided the "I feel bad about my day and so I'm going to stop being healthy" trap, and even though I really wanted the baked goods that some sorority was selling (those girls can really bake!), I totally resisted.

So, yeah. I was on call in all my classes (which I have never seen happen to anyone, yet) and totally embarrassed myself in front of my crush professor and made him frustrated and disappointed in the process.

GO ME!

VC